Difference between revisions of "Integrated Item View"

From Dryad wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
    "Status: This page is outdated and of historical use only."
 +
 +
This page offers options for the display and download of data files on the same page with the data package; this was implemented in September 2011.
 +
 
'''1. Mockup of Integrated File/Package Record View'''
 
'''1. Mockup of Integrated File/Package Record View'''
  
Line 5: Line 9:
 
''Comments:''
 
''Comments:''
  
1) here
+
1) I like having the versioning information up top, and same w/DOIs.  RE: Dryad data files, is this going to be a new public label, or just jotted down for the mock-up?  Think we want to say package data files instead.  Same--we using the label:  "Related content outside of Dryad"?  It is explicit, but long.General comment that applies to this mock-up and all others is what about screen real estate and lenght of abstracts.  Do we have an idea of length?  Breadcrumbs may be useful for displaying fields w/extensive content.  --[[User:Janeg@ils.unc.edu|Janeg@ils.unc.edu]] 23:12, 19 September 2010 (EDT)
  
  
Line 14: Line 18:
 
''Comments:''
 
''Comments:''
  
1) here
+
1) Same comments for mock-up 1, and i do like the journal cover.  I'm left-handed, and want it on the left-side, but this just may be me :).  will this be a problem w/screen real estate? i think this is the mock-up i prefer most, although i may change my mind after hearing insights from others.--[[User:Janeg@ils.unc.edu|Janeg@ils.unc.edu]] 23:12, 19 September 2010 (EDT)
 +
 
 +
2) I like the journal cover, and know our partners will too.  It reinforces the link to the article, and should be next to the article citation. I don't care exactly where it displays as long as it is at the top of the page, and legible/recognizable.  [[User:Pschaeffer@nescent.org|Peggy Schaeffer]] 09:39, 20 September 2010 (EDT)
 +
 
  
  
Line 23: Line 30:
 
''Comments:''
 
''Comments:''
  
1) here
+
1) journal cover too far down.--[[User:Janeg@ils.unc.edu|Janeg@ils.unc.edu]] 23:12, 19 September 2010 (EDT)
 +
2) ditto [[User:Pschaeffer@nescent.org|Peggy Schaeffer]] 09:39, 20 September 2010 (EDT)
  
  
Line 32: Line 40:
 
''Comments:''
 
''Comments:''
  
1)
+
1) same as above, journal cover too far down.--[[User:Janeg@ils.unc.edu|Janeg@ils.unc.edu]] 23:12, 19 September 2010 (EDT)
 +
2) ditto [[User:Pschaeffer@nescent.org|Peggy Schaeffer]] 09:39, 20 September 2010 (EDT)
  
[[Category:Mockups]]
+
[[Category:]]
 +
[[Category:Mockups Outdated]]

Latest revision as of 05:42, 31 May 2012

    "Status: This page is outdated and of historical use only."

This page offers options for the display and download of data files on the same page with the data package; this was implemented in September 2011.

1. Mockup of Integrated File/Package Record View

Integrated-file-package-view.png

Comments:

1) I like having the versioning information up top, and same w/DOIs. RE: Dryad data files, is this going to be a new public label, or just jotted down for the mock-up? Think we want to say package data files instead. Same--we using the label: "Related content outside of Dryad"? It is explicit, but long.General comment that applies to this mock-up and all others is what about screen real estate and lenght of abstracts. Do we have an idea of length? Breadcrumbs may be useful for displaying fields w/extensive content. --Janeg@ils.unc.edu 23:12, 19 September 2010 (EDT)


2. Mockup of Integrated File/Package Record View with Journal Cover (Version 1)

Integrated-with-journal-1.png

Comments:

1) Same comments for mock-up 1, and i do like the journal cover. I'm left-handed, and want it on the left-side, but this just may be me :). will this be a problem w/screen real estate? i think this is the mock-up i prefer most, although i may change my mind after hearing insights from others.--Janeg@ils.unc.edu 23:12, 19 September 2010 (EDT)

2) I like the journal cover, and know our partners will too. It reinforces the link to the article, and should be next to the article citation. I don't care exactly where it displays as long as it is at the top of the page, and legible/recognizable. Peggy Schaeffer 09:39, 20 September 2010 (EDT)


3. Mockup of Integrated File/Package Record View with Journal Cover (Version 2)

Integrated-with-journal-2.png

Comments:

1) journal cover too far down.--Janeg@ils.unc.edu 23:12, 19 September 2010 (EDT) 2) ditto Peggy Schaeffer 09:39, 20 September 2010 (EDT)


4. Mockup of Integrated File/Package Record View with Journal Cover (Version 3)

Integrated-with-journal-3.png

Comments:

1) same as above, journal cover too far down.--Janeg@ils.unc.edu 23:12, 19 September 2010 (EDT) 2) ditto Peggy Schaeffer 09:39, 20 September 2010 (EDT)

[[Category:]]