Difference between revisions of "Large File Transfer"

From Dryad wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(HTTP)
(SCP)
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
== SCP ==
 
== SCP ==
 +
 +
Pro:
 +
* Quick, easy, secure.
 +
 +
Con:
 +
* Still not a standard install on Windows machines.
  
 
== Mailed USB key ==
 
== Mailed USB key ==

Revision as of 13:47, 16 June 2011

Dryad needs to accept uploads of large files. These files must be transferred outside the normal submission system unless/until a better transfer mechanism is built into the submission system.

HTTP

Some institutions use HTTP for large transfers. Perhaps we can reconfigure our servers to work better over HTTP?

Pro:

  • can be built into the submission system easily

Con:

  • times out easily, especially on low-quality Internet connections

FTP

We are currently testing file transfers via ftp2.nescent.org. When a transfer is needed, NESCent IT must turn on the service, and they should be notified to shut down the service after a transfer is complete.

Pro:

  • simple and well understood

Con:

  • security issues

SCP

Pro:

  • Quick, easy, secure.

Con:

  • Still not a standard install on Windows machines.

Mailed USB key

Pro:

  • can transfer very large files without worrying about size and bandwidth concerns

Con:

  • doesn't seem "professional"
  • may take a long time for international authors

BioTorrents

Pro:

  • can transfer large files efficiently

Con:

  • The process of creating a torrent file is too complex for a typical Dryad user.