Difference between revisions of "Meeting Technology"
From Dryad wiki
Ryan Scherle (talk | contribs) |
Ryan Scherle (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Notes: | Notes: | ||
| − | + | # Marratech is much better than Adobe Connect when more than 3 participants need to send video. However, Marratech has two major drawbacks: | |
| − | + | #* NESCent does not have a license for it -- so only use it when meetings include participants from NCEAS. | |
| − | + | #* Installation and initial configuration is error-prone and time-consuming -- so it should only be used for recurring meetings. | |
| − | + | # iChat is better than Skype when video is used. However, it only works when all participants are using Macs. | |
[[Category:Software]] | [[Category:Software]] | ||
[[Category:Project Management]] | [[Category:Project Management]] | ||
Revision as of 12:45, 11 February 2010
Dryad meetings use a variety of technologies for remote participation. To determine the best technology for a meeting, follow the flowchart below.
Notes:
- Marratech is much better than Adobe Connect when more than 3 participants need to send video. However, Marratech has two major drawbacks:
- NESCent does not have a license for it -- so only use it when meetings include participants from NCEAS.
- Installation and initial configuration is error-prone and time-consuming -- so it should only be used for recurring meetings.
- iChat is better than Skype when video is used. However, it only works when all participants are using Macs.
