Difference between revisions of "Old:December 2006 Workshop Plans"

From Dryad wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 77: Line 77:
  
 
''Provisional agenda''
 
''Provisional agenda''
 +
 
Day 1:  
 
Day 1:  
 
*Introductions and presentation of objectives
 
*Introductions and presentation of objectives

Revision as of 06:18, 10 November 2006

December Meeting

  • Date: Dec 5, 2006
  • Time: ?
  • Place: NESCent

Participants

  • Kathleen Smith
  • NESCent-MRC DRIADE team
  • Michael Whitlock (American Naturalist)
  • Don Waller (SSE)
  • Mark Rausher (Evolution)
  • Marcy Uyenoyama (MBE)
  • Bob Peet (to discuss the experience of Ecology)
  • Others?

Objective

  • To inform the society and journal reps of our plans to date
  • To discuss how to gather requirements.

Agenda

  • (Uncertain until we have a better idea of the length of the meeting)
  • Todd & Hilmar: Known and unknown requirements to date, and plans for two workshops
  • Jane: The landscape of data repositories, and what will be needed from societies and journals


March Meeting

Potential participants

  • NESCent-MRC people
  • Matt Jones (SEEK)
  • Sarah & Eric Kanza (OpenContext) & Ahrash Bissell (OpenContext, Duke)
  • ? (CIESEN)
  • Lagoze? (OAI)
  • ? (Marine Metadata Initiative)
  • ? (Odum Institute) – sustainability, heterogenous ingest
  • Tom Hammond (Conservation Commons)
  • John Willbanks, (Science Commons, GBIF) – IP, metadata standards
  • David Schloen (OCHRE)?
  • Bruce Bauer (World Data Center for Paleoclimatology)
  • Val Tannen (Data integration, Treebase)
  • ? (Genbank)
  • Greg Ricardo (Morphbank)
  • Emilia Martins (EthBase)
  • ? (NSF Cyberinfrastructure)

Potential floaters

  • C. Lynch
  • J. Kim
  • R. Page

Goals 1. Obtain guidance on design features covering all aspects of the OAIS model: Ingest—receipt and verification of records; Archival Storage—secure storage of records; Data Management—secure management of records; Administration—management of internal and external relations; Preservation—management of record integrity and security over time; and Access—provision of records in response to user queries.

2. Particular areas of concern: Management issues

  • How would the system be administered?
  • How can depositors be incentivized?
  • How would the system be sustainably funded?
  • What intellectual property policies need to be put into place?

System architecture issues

  • What is the role for bona fide data federation/integration technology?
  • What is the (meaning of and) need for a trusted repository?
  • What is the role of distributed/grid storage?

User interface and interoperability issues

  • How to synchronize ingestion with journal publication and 3rd-part database deposition?
  • How to enable harvesting of data by 3rd-parties (e.g. OAI-MHP)?
  • What should be the functionality of the interface to the centralized registry?
  • What metadata is required an how to generate it (Dublin Core, DDI-lite, EML, standards imposed by specialized repositories)?

Provisional agenda

Day 1:

  • Introductions and presentation of objectives
  • Refine, as a group, tasks for the breakout sessions.
  • Three concurrent breakout sessions over lunch and into early afternoon, with short chalktalks relevant to each topic followed by focused discussion on the breakout tasks.
  • Break
  • Late afternoon breakout group summaries

Day 2:

  • Three concurrent morning breakout sessions, again with short chalktalks relevant to each topic followed by focused discussion on the breakout tasks.
  • Lunch
  • 1-2 hour large group discussion
  • Writing of recommendations